hogglestock

Contrary to earlier Twitter and Facebook reports, I didn’t actually buy 61 books at Powell’s late last month. John got about five books, so that means I only got 56 books. A much more reasonable number. For those of you who don’t know, Powell’s City of Books in Portland, Oregon is the largest bookstore in the U.S. and I think the best. One of my favorite parts is that they have used, new, and remainders all intermixed on their shelves. This makes for a very satisfying browsing experience. I also love that one will always find a hidden gem or two–even if you limit yourself to just one section.

On our most recent visit to Powell’s I focused combing the fiction from A to Z. On other trips I have looked for specific titles or authors and then also browsed other sections of the store. I’m glad I did A to Z fiction this time. But next time I think I need to go Z to A. By the time I got to the Ds, I already had 14 books in my basket. I could have spent more time in the store, but after three hours on one of the most beautiful days Portland could offer I thought it was time to get out and about. There were a few other times over the weekend where I thought about going back but I was too busy eating.

When you got to Powell’s try going on a weekday during the day. If you have to go on the weekend get there when they open to avoid most of the poseurs. You know the type, those that maybe buy one book that they are never going to read. Nothing bad about these folks, but do you really want them getting in the way? Having said that Powell’s is huge and never, ever feels cramped like Strands Books in NYC can.

You can scroll down to see the whole list of my haul, but I know that most of you appreciate a photo or two of book finds. So here it goes.

Acevedo, Chantel – The Distant Marvels
Ackerley, J.R. – My Father and Myself
Alcott, Louisa May – Behind a Mask (Her Unknown Thrillers)

Allen, Walter – All in a Lifetime
Ashton, Helen – The Half-Crown House
Atherton, Gertrude – American Wives & English Husbands
Auchincloss, Louis – The Rector of Justin
Bailey, Paul – The Prince’s Boy

Bates, H.E. – A Breath of French Air
Bates, H.E. – The Darling Buds of May


Benson, E.F. – An Autumn Sowing
Benson, E.F. – David Blaize
Benson, E.F. – Desirable Residences (A new Miss Mapp story)
Benson, E.F. – Mrs. Ames
Chase, Ilka – New York 22
Collins, Wilkie – Iolani; or, Tahiti as it was.
Cresswell, Helen – Ordinary Jack
Dumas, Alexandre – Louise de la Valliere
Gissing, George – In the Year of Jubilee

Grumbach, Doris – Chamber Music
Grumbach, Doris – Fifty Days of Solitude
Grumbach, Doris – The Ladies
Grumbach, Doris – The Pleasure of their Company
Hosain, Attia – Sunlight on a Broken Column
Hyland, M.J. – How the Light Gets In
Keyes, Frances Parkinson – Also the Hills
Larkin, Philip – A Girl in Winter
Larkin, Philip – Jill
Lively, Penelope – Spiderweb
Manning, Olivia – The Doves of Venus

Mendelson, Charlotte – When We Were Bad
Mendelson, Cheryl – Morningside Heights
McPherson, William – Testing the Current
Michaels, Leonard – The Men’s Club

Miller, Merle – A Day in Late September
Miller, Merle – That Winter
Monson, Ander – Letter to a Future Lover
O’Grady, Rohan – Let’s Kill Uncle
Priestley, J.B. – Bright Day
Roberts, Cecil – Victoria 4:30
Sackville-West, Edward – Simpson
Sackville-West, Vita – The Easter Party
Shute, Nevil – Beyond the Black Stump
Soseki, Natsume – The Gate
Spark, Muriel – Robinson

Trollope, Anthony – The American Senator
Trollope, Anthony – The Claverings
Trollope, Anthony – The Fixed Period
Trollope, Anthony – Kept in the Dark
Trollope, Anthony – Mr. Scarborough’s Family
Trollope, Anthony – Orley Farm
Trollope, Anthony – Ralph the Heir
Trollope, Anthony – The Tireless Traveller
Trollope, Anthony – Why Frau Frohmann Raised Her Prices and Other Stories
Waugh, Evelyn – The Complete Stories

 

One of the million reasons I think Portland, Oregon is one of the greatest cities on the planet is that it has a store dedicated to zines.  Remember zines? Surprised they still exist in 2015? Me too. Not only do they exist, but Reading Frenzy is a fantastic little shop just across the Willamette River from downtown Portland that specializes in them. Back in their heyday I wasn’t exactly a reader/consumer of zines, but there is something so charming about the fact that they are still out there. As a blogger, podcaster, Tweeter, Facebooker, and GoodReadser, I love how the Internet brings together bookish people and provides an almost limitless resource for all things bookish in a way that someone who grew up in the rather isolating 1970s and 1980s could never have imagined. But, as regular readers know, I am a bit of an old fashioned guy with a bit of a nostalgia kick for rotary phones, typewriters, card catalogs, and all things paper.

I was delighted when John and I stumbled across Reading Frenzy after an amazing breakfast at Sweedeedee. I was even more delighted when I spotted something called Shelf Life: adventures in used book hunting. Holy God, have I died and gone to heaven? As someone who all but gave up buying new books–or at least gave up the sport of buying new books–in favor of much more interesting used book quarry years ago, I couldn’t have asked for a more. There were two issues available and I scooped up one of each without any hesitation.

I didn’t get around to reading Shelf Life until we got back to DC. I picked it up one night when I couldn’t quite settle on what to read before I went to bed. I thought I would just take a quick look before falling asleep. But within seconds of dipping in I was hooked. Written by 20-something (?) couple Annie and Tim, Shelf Life is just what the subtitle indicates, a chronicle of their adventures in used book hunting. What could easily turn into a bunch of Yelp reviews is instead a charming chronicle of Annie’s and Tim’s proclivities, foibles, peeves, and thoughts on used books and book stores. Sigh.

The one thought I had as I tried to ration the two issues was “WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO PUBLISH MORE?” Almost concurrently I wondered why they don’t do this online in digital format. But, for reasons alluded to earlier, I am glad they don’t. I feel like I am stepping back in time even if some of their review-essays bemoan the very modern use of book scanners at used book sales and other nods to the fact that it is 2015.

There was also part of me that wanted to offer my services as a correspondent, and part of me that wanted to get encyclopedic on Hogglestock about my own adventures in used book hunting. But in the end, I am glad it is what it is and nothing more.

If you want to get your own copies of Shelf Life you can find them here at their Etsy shop. If you want to relive some of my tales of used book shopping look no further than these:

16 used bookshops in 14 Days
Barns full of books and fields full of flowers
Finding needles in haystacks
The giant Tompkins County, New York book sale
A local bookstore hunt
The greatest book about used books ever written (84, Charing Cross Road)
Getting obsessive about old paperbacks in San Francisco and DC
Book hunting in Kaua’i
When Frances wrote about our trip to the book ‘store’ where everything is free 
Then we did a special podcast segment about our trip to the free book store
And who could forget Chris’s tale of book barn outside of New Haven, CT

Normally vacation means a fair amount of time to read and hunt for books. This is especially true when we install ourselves for two weeks up in Maine. Not sure there is anything more conducive to reading than Maine in the summer. This summer our vacation was slightly, and by slightly, I mean a whole lot more, active than normal. I’ve already posted some pictures of our 5-day whitewater raft trip down the Middle Fork of the Salmon River in Idaho. Normally I take way more books on a trip than I would ever have time for but this time I resisted. The combination of being on the water most of the time and the fact that after the river trip I would be making another pilgrimage to Powell’s City of Books in Portland, Oregon, gave me the confidence to only take TWO books for about 11 days a way from home.

I was right to limit myself. The flight out west was late at night and consisted of more sleeping than reading, and the active and social nature of the river trip made it hard to find time to read. We were just as active in Portland, and despite spending three hours at Powell’s, I didn’t really find much time to read there either.

There were a few choice reading moments, however. One involved a wildly energetic (and hilarious) 12-year old on the river trip who warmed my heart when he joined me one morning as I was reading. I’m not sure I ever inspired any child to read before. He even referred to it later as our reading club.

I have lots of blog post ideas floating through my head, but don’t have the time at the moment to write any of them. But I will provide a little something for you all to look at until I get myself together. John and I were lucky enough to join one of his college friends and his family and friends on a 5-day ‘float’ down the Middle Fork of the Salmon River in Idaho. The Middle Fork is in one of the most pristine wilderness areas in the U.S. and there was blessedly no such thing as a cell phone signal anywhere along the route. Here is a little sampler.

I may have time for another post before we leave on vacation, but in the meantime I am daydreaming about some of our past August trips. More than Italy, France, or any number of other places we have gone in August, the one that continually draws me back and makes me the most wistful for summer vacation is Maine. We haven’t been there since 2012 because of the house project and we are missing it. So much so that we have already booked our house for next summer.  For now, I will leave you with some of the more evocative photos from August 2011 and 2012. (You can also go back to those months in the archives see many more pictures and stories.)

We were up in Buck County, Pennsylvania this weekend and spent the night in Philly.  When I did my research to see which used bookstores I might want to frequent I came across Baldwin’s Book Barn not too far out of Philadelphia in West Chester. It turned out to be a good call. The place is really charming and has a huge inventory. While I didn’t find anything that made me squeal I did leave with 21 books.

On the way to the Book Barn, John realized we were in the general vicinity of Longwood Gardens. He has been there before and loved it, so after adjusting my typical, I didn’t plan it so I don’t want to go attitude, I was really glad we went. Through John I have become a big fan of gardens, and not just as places to read. After a lunch in the cafe we had a lovely wander (and I got a chance to hear the pipe organ). We didn’t take many/any pictures of many flowers but he meadow was sure enticing.

By now most of you are probably tired of hearing about Go Set a Watchman. Just a week ago I was mad as heck that news organs were putting spoilers in headlines. Since then Simon and I spent some time on The Readers talking about the hype (not the spoilers) and our feelings about the then impending release of the book and whether or not we were going to read it. Also, since then I have purchased the book and managed to read it within 24 hours. As I was in the middle of reading it, Simon further articulated why he wasn’t going to read it. His various reasons weren’t necessarily wrong, but having read the book now, all I can say is he is missing out on something.

Is the book a literary train wreck?
No. Could it use some editorial help? Yes, but this unedited draft is so much better than  many books that pass for good these days. In fact, this might have been the talking point that most annoyed me on social media in the past week. Suddenly everyone and their dog was an expert on writing. To be perfectly honest, I didn’t even think about it needing an editor until the last 50 pages or so. After reading the book, I feel like Tweets about how badly Harper Lee needed an editor had much more to do with know-it-all me-too-ism of the Tweeter and less to do with the book.

Isn’t Harper Lee being exploited?
I have a very simple–and admittedly simplistic–take on this point. Either Harper Lee is lucid and mentally in control of her affairs and allowed the publication or she isn’t. But if indeed she isn’t, then is she lucid enough to find any of this distressing? And I think the notion that artists should be able to control their legacy after their deaths is unrealistic. If you don’t want your juvenalia or correspondence published, you should burn it. If you are enough of an icon that people are going to care about that kind of stuff, you best burn it while you have the chance. The beloved Willa Cather didn’t want her correspondence published? Well she should have destroyed it because she is important enough that fans and scholars want to know more about her and her work. Why let something outlive you if you don’t want it to live? If we find a Mozart sonata he didn’t want published do we say “oh no, no one is allowed to play this because Mozart didn’t want us to”? Or what if we find a sketch book of Da Vinci’s that is marked “Private-keep out”? Do we not look at it?

Is it just a different version of To Kill a Mockingbird?
No. Not even close. Lee uses the same characters, she uses the same setting, she uses roughly the same period of time, and she references the trial that ended up in TKAM. But everything else is different. It really shouldn’t be seen as a sequel but I think it can actually work as a sequel if one doesn’t get too nitpicky about it.

Will it make me not like my favorite characters in To Kill a Mockingbird?
This is perhaps the one thing that has most readers worried about reading Go Set a Watchman. By now you probably have all discovered the main spoiler of the book. It is almost impossible that you haven’t given the cynical use of spoilers in headlines by most news organizations. But I still am not going to say what it is. But I will say this, in GSAW you will end up not liking a character you liked in TKAM. Will that dislike ruin your love of TKAM? I doubt it. TKAM is a wonderful, wonderfully written book that was inspiring to so many of us. Will it change the way you think about TKAM? I sure as hell hope so, but more on that in a minute.

The MS is so old, isn’t it stale?
No. Given the events in South Carolina recently and the discussions around racism and the Confederate battle flag, this book could not be more topical. In fact, I would say the book is maddeningly, and sadly far too topical. Almost all of the parts that deal with racism and how it was playing out in the courts and in the South are relevant not just to the issue of race but also to marriage equality.

Can I call myself a reader if I don’t read it?
Not really. I say that with tongue-in-cheek and with a wink, but there is some truth to it. There are certainly works of literary greatness that I know I don’t want to read, and this is no literary masterpiece, so why do I think you need to read it? Because TKAM is not just a good book it is a cultural icon and had an effect that went far beyond literary circles. To not be interested in what else was going on in the head of the author of that work doesn’t really fit the profile of a true reader. But if you don’t find that convincing how could a true reader not be curious about the writing process and how this early, rejected draft turned into what became one of the masterpieces of the 20th century? How can you not find that interesting?

Why was draft rejected?
Of course I don’t know the answer to this, but I am pretty damn sure it was not because the book was irredeemably flawed or beyond the help of an editor. However, one may feel about the quality of the text, there is no way that this can be the case. Fifty percent of the ‘properly edited’ novels published in the past 50 years are more flawed than this one. No, the reason this book was rejected was that the country wasn’t ready for it. Lee clearly had race on her mind when she wrote both GSAW and TKAM. Growing up in the deeply racist, Jim Crow South, it is clear that Lee wanted to say something about the hate she witnessed. Written in the 1950s, GSAW was way too militantly anti-racist to have found much of an audience. (One could argue that both of Lee’s novels, despite their outwardly anti-racist content, still evince the author’s own vestiges of racism or white privilege, but that is an essay I am not qualified to write.)

Even if it had been a literary masterpiece there is no way a book that so explicitly calls out the haters was going to be well received at the time. In fact, the explicitness of text is one of the things that keeps the book from being better than it is. Not because Lee shouldn’t have been so pointed in her criticism of racism but because the way she does it felt a bit like a breathless undergraduate railing against evil in a college newspaper. In places it goes from narrative to screed. As both TKAM and parts of GSAW show, Lee is a gifted writer. Her editor could have helped her turn Watchman into something pretty amazing. But he and probably everyone else in the white publishing world back then didn’t want to touch the issue in such a head on manner. In retrospect it is so clear why they, and the country, would prefer the much warmer TKAM. It doesn’t really deal with race head on, it waters down the issue into a more abstract focus on justice and due process that white Americans could feel better about than confronting their own racism.

There is no doubt in my mind that To Kill a Mockingbird was an important book to help ease the country along the path to a being a more just, less racist place. But to do so it had to soft-pedal the issue and sitting here now in 2015 almost 60 years after Go Set a Watchman was rejected, race relations haven’t changed nearly as much as they need to. It’s time we set aside our sentimental, happy, warm, righteous love of Atticus Finch and To Kill a Mockingbird. It’s a sign of white privilege that we were able to see it that way in the first place.

One can be made to feel guilty about enjoying reality TV, especially the Real Housewives of Orange County or New York or Beverly Hills or New Jersey or Atlanta where there is no other point to the show other than to see people being mean and catty and stupid. I tend not to feel too guilty about it. In my opinion these shows are a lot less perverse than endless scripted dramas about murder and crime. For some reason we humans seem to like watching unfortunate people doing unfortunate things.

Lately I’ve been listening to audio versions of Benson’s Lucia and Mapp books. I’ve read all of them in the past and have watched the brilliant 1980s TV adaptation with Geraldine McEwan, Prunella Scales, and Nigel Hawthorne a million times. I’ve also watched the recent TV adaptation (which I thought was pretty to look at but very unsatisfying). Each form of the books is wonderful in its own way, but the audiobooks really do make the best of Benson’s material. They bring the printed word to life and unlike the TV versions, you still get to hear every word Benson wrote. And they are marvelous and funny and just plain wonderful.

As I listened to the first two of the series (Queen Lucia and Miss Mapp) I was struck by how wonderfully awful Benson’s characters are to each other and how so many of their shenanigans are replayed each week on one of the Real Housewives shows.

Gossip: The lifeblood of Benson and the Real Housewives. The characters make the collection and sharing of gossip an art form. The only difference is most of the Real Housewives at some point will say “If you have something to say about me, say it to my face.” With the exception of Quaint Irene, I don’t think a Benson character would ever think that a good idea.

Frenemies: These characters love to have “friends” who are unafraid to stab each other in the back. The Bensonites are certainly more polite than their Real Housewives counterparts and are more likely to pull back just short of letting their bad behavior break the genteel surface, and extend symbolic olive branches to ensure their adversaries live to fight another day. On the Real Housewives they always take it a step too far, scream at each other, and then pretend to make up so they can “move forward”.

Can’t support a charity without having a party: For both Benson and the Real Housewives, a pretty frock, plenty to eat and drink, and lots of narcissistic ‘altruism’ are prerequisites for philanthropy.

Keeping up with the Joneses: Whether its Mapp and Godiva and their dueling dresses and Mrs Wyse and her furs and Rolls or a Real Housewife driving a leased Bentley, these people infuse possessions with status.

Gurus and other spiritual quackery: Despite dear Daisy and the gang always looking for the next best spiritual fad to lead the  to a higher plane or the Real  Housewives and their mediums, sage-ings, and crystals, they all still claim to be Christians.

Charlatans: Lucia and Georgie pretending they know Italian and any number of Real Housewives pretending they can sing. Why do they do it? Everyone knows the truth and talks about it behind their backs.

Vanity: The Real Housewives may have their plastic surgery and make-artists, but who’s to say that is any different than Georgie’s ministrations with toupes and hair dye?

While Benson predates the Real Housewives by about 80 years, I don’t think he was the first to invent these kinds of characters. I am sure there are many examples but the one that comes to my mind is the ladies of Cranford. Certainly much nicer than Benson’s characters but not without their petty schemes and proof that our desire to witness this kind of behavior runs deep.

When I was in the midst of researching and writing the history of a 160-year old insane asylum I led monthly tours of the abandoned, boarded up, 176-acre Victorian-era campus. Without fail at least one person in every group asked about ghosts. When other people led the tour they would offer up a rather boring tale of a door slamming shut. When I led the tour I would alternate between saying that being a doubting Thomas, I was the wrong person to ask, or I would that it did a dishonor to the lives of the thousands of troubled souls who lived at the hospital to sensationalize its history. Either way, those interested in such things no doubt found me to be quite the buzzkill.

What level of belief is necessary to enjoy a ghost story?

Needing something to listen to on my commute and having a long standing notion that I needed to give the fiction of Susan Hill a go led me to choose The Woman in Black. Over the years I have seen much praise for the book and the moment seemed right for me to see what all the fuss was about. It turned out to be perfect on audiobook. I think Hill perfectly conveys the time and setting of the book and her language and dialog felt right to me. I found it quite enjoyable and there were definitely some page-turning, suspense-filled moments. But about a third of the way until the end I started to think about how some judicious editing could improve the now-lagging story. While she tried to string along the suspense for as many pages as she could it gave me a chance to think about some of the flaws in the story and the telling of the story. If I had any sort of tolerance for the paranormal this wouldn’t have happened.

Without including any kind of spoilers, let me just say that when I found out the nature of the paranormal activity and its outcome, my overwhelming thought was “so what?” and “is that it?”. Again if this sort of thing was my thing I probably would not have been so dismissive.

However, I will say that I enjoyed Hill’s writing well enough that I will probably give her another go in the future. Despite my disappointment toward the end, I really did enjoy the listening/reading experience. One of those cases where the journey is more enjoyable than the destination.

No comment of mine on Susan Hill would be complete without referencing my near-tirade about her book about books Howards End is on the Landing.

When I first read Consequences by Penelope Lively in 2009 I liked it so much I gave it a 9 on my 10-point scale. Just one point off being an all-time favorite. Having just finished listening to the audio version I’m not just reminded of how much I like the book but I am inclined to upgrade it to a full 10 out of 10. In fact, liked it so much that I decided to write this post as soon as the narrator said “The end.” (I’m not sure she actually did, but you get the point.)

As is often my challenge, I have many things to say about a book but the thought of having to come up with some coherent, cogent review is beyond my patience and abilities. So, it’s time for another bulleted list.

• The book begins in 1934 when artist Matt meets Lorna on a park bench in London. The story ends with their 44 year-old granddaughter Ruth contemplating the balance of her life. In the middle is all the wonderful and tragic and thoughtful things that happen to them, their daughter/mother Molly, and their small, somewhat unconventional family.
• This one will appeal to the Bohemian in you. A woodblock artist, book maker, writers, librarian, gallery employee, arts administrator, and a poet all walk through the story at various points.
• Lively has the mind of an historian but also of an historiographer. She not only tends to pepper her novels with historical bits and bobs but she often explores how we know what we know about the past and contemplates more than a little about the effects of time and perspective on how we feel and understand things. But she is subtle about it and it never feels pedantic or preachy.
• Lively the person looks fairly conventional and perhaps even a little staid, but her characters are rarely so. Don’t get me wrong, they aren’t wild and they tend not to do crazy or silly things but they burn with passions and determination that appeal to me. And she writes about sex, relationships, and faith (or lack thereof) in and open, and often progressive way but always on the decorous side.
• Despite the many tragedies that happen along the way, so many wonderful things happen as well. And for both the good and the bad there is the recurrent theme of how certain moments, some are choices, some are not choices lead to, um, consequences–outcomes, new trajectories, triumph and tragedy. Something that occurs in more than a few of her other novels as well, most notably perhaps, and most recently in How it All Began.
• There was a really wonderful story in Slate this week about Persephone Books and it got me to thinking just how perfectly Consequences would fit in with their catalog. (Now that I think of it they have already published Consequences the 1919 novel by E.M. Delafield.) I’ve often reduced the output of Persephone to being cozy, but after reading the Slate piece, I realize I have been selling them and the books short. They are about the domestic side of life for sure, but for as much as I like that kind of thing, I think I have been slightly dismissive of how important that is not just for my own pleasure but for chronicling and understanding civilization.
• Would do really well adapted to large or small screen. Although when looking up whether or not someone has already done so, I came across Ursula K LeGuin’s less than glowing review of the book in The Guardian in 2007. I won’t link to it.